Saturday, September 11, 2010

My Name is Khan and “I am not a Terrorist.”




Ultimate Bollywood » Bollywood Features » 2010

The film My Name is Khan is particularly relevant this week on the occasion of the 9th anniversary of 9/11. It is particularly befitting with the recent release of the DVD of the film -- first Bollywood production to gross $4 million.

by Raj S. Rangarajan

How five months make a world of difference. When My Name is Khan was released early in Spring this year Bollywood-watchers were waiting with trepidation – if not suspense – whether this film which such an obvious title would make it big at the box office. Now, after 150 days the Shah Rukh Khan-Kajol starrer continues to raise eyebrows in terms of storyline and box office value.

The film from Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment is now available on DVD and on Amazon.com and is the top Bollywood film for 2010 with $4 million gross. According to Gitesh Pandya the film guru who monitors and reports on Bollywood films, My Name is Khan surpassed SRK’s earlier record of $3.6 million for Om Shanti Om, released in 2007. It is also director Karan Johar’s biggest film ever.

But, with the new controversy over the mosque to be built at Ground Zero in lower Manhattan hogging the headlines in some sections of the media with pro- and anti-Muslim adherents, its anybody’s guess as to how DVD sales will be affected.

SRK and Kajol deliver powerful performances in this romance that proves true love knows no boundaries. Shah Rukh Khan (Rizvan Khan), an Indian with a unique way of looking at his world and Kajol Devgan (Mandira Rathore), a vivacious single mother, are the main characters and their chemistry on the screen is well-known.

They form a special bond and fall in love against all odds, but fate and tragedy conspire to tear them apart. Just when it appears as though all hope is lost, Rizwan embarks on a remarkable journey across America to win back the love of his life.

Made with a sensitive touch, the movie carries a polarizing influence perhaps more because of the theme and title. The fact that Khan’s last name is Muslim is perhaps incidental but that’s not how some cinemagoers view the movie whether they live in downtown, New York or in downtown Murfreesboro, Tennessee where a mosque was recently vandalized.

The film is particularly relevant this week on the occasion of 9/11’s ninth anniversary. After September 11, 2001, more movies with a “terrorist” theme seem to sell better in the United States. Remember New York, the film, starring John Abraham and Katrina Kaif and Kurbaan 2009 with Saif Ali Khan and Kareena Kapoor.

After their mother’s passing in India, Rizvan’s younger brother, portrayed by Jimmy Shergill invites Rizvan to move to San Francisco. When Rizvan wants to marry Mandira who runs a successful hairdressing outfit, Jimmy’s character objects but never explains why. A major twist in the story occurs when Mandira’s son is beaten up in a playground by boys of Caucasian origin. Motives are attributed to the incident without adequate explanations even by the law enforcement authorities.

No investigation is conducted by anyone and soon the boy’s death is a closed chapter for the authorities. But, not for Mandira who has been personally affected. The racial profiling mindset in the movie is telling in that when Mandira declares, “if my son’s name was Rathore – not Khan – he would have been alive.”

People who experience overt discrimination in some degree or other can relate to this movie directly. Each parent and child in North America has his or her own defence mechanism to deal with such real-life situations and this movie drives close to home. One cannot judge whether the incident was racially-motivated or whether it was the effect of a smaller boy – a South Asian kid – taking on a bigger boy, who happened to be Caucasian.

While Rizvan Khan is constantly muttering that he is not a terrorist but wants to meet the American president it is never explained why he wishes to meet the leader. Is it because his mother had inculcated in him a desire to do so? Or is it because Mandira, in a fit of pique, challenges him to do so. Kajol sparkles as usual and SRK tends to overact.

The Director’'s and cameramen'’s subtle nuances are touching. Niranjan Iyengar'’s dialogue is pithy and cinematographer, Ravi K. Chandran has proven once again that he is a classy performer.

An uplifting story of understanding and tolerance, the movie is mostly shot in San Francisco and runs 185 minutes. The DVD is closed-captioned and carries subtitles in English, Spanish and French ideal for any weekend viewing.

[Raj S. Rangarajan is a New York based freelance writer. He covers trend stories on art, reviews books and films for media based in New York, Toronto, Republic of Korea and India.]

Sunday, August 8, 2010

Seven crores for sperm elephant sculpture





Retail Plus Chennai














Continuing the bullish trend in contemporary art sales Sotheby’s London recorded yet another successful auction recently. Among the impressive results was Bharti Kher’s life-sized female Indian elephant sculpture – The Skin Speaks a Language not its Own – that established not only a record for the artist but also a new record for any work by a contemporary female Indian artist at an auction. The 142 x 456.2 x 195 cm masterpiece sold for INR 7.1 crores (£993,250 or USD 1.5 million).

In this work that took ten months to create in her Gurgaon studio, Bharti focused on every fold and recess of the sunken pachyderm form and meticulously contoured it in intricately arranged patterns of thousands of “bindis” that organically swarm across the beast in a second skin.

The interesting twist is that Bharti’s bindis are sperm-shaped and on close observation one sees millions of swimming images that constitute a tired elephant about to recline. The artist easily combines two recognised, but powerful symbols of India – the Indian bindi and the Indian elephant. Her other well-known colourful bindi arrangement on a painted board is “Untitled” and adorns a gallery in the UK.














Emphasizing the importance of this sculpture, Director and Head of Sotheby’s Indian Art Department, Zara Porter-Hill said, “Despite our familiarity with elephants, nothing prepares the viewer for the emotional experience of seeing Bharti Kher’s elephant – huge and incongruous in the gallery space. With her head resting on her front foot, she is brought down to our level and the glassy black eye entreats a communion and proximity rarely encountered in the wild.”

Forty-year-old, Bharti was born in London, England, studied at the Middlesex Polytechnic, Cat Hill, London and did her B.A. Honours in Fine Art and Painting at Newcastle Polytechnic. Interestingly, Bharti’s is a reverse case of the émigré moving to India from the UK at age 23. The Indian milieu of having been in Delhi since 1993 has undoubtedly helped Bharti excel in her chosen endeavour though admittedly, in today’s global art marketplace where one pitches one’s tent is perhaps irrelevant.

The fact that she is married to renowned artist Subodh Gupta, known for his unique stainless utensils art, is perhaps incidental.

(A New York based independent trend writer, Raj S. Rangarajan reports on the art market and auto shows and reviews films for media based in New York; Toronto, Canada; Seoul, Korea and India.)

talktoretailplus@yahoo.com

RAJ S RANGARAJAN

Sunday, July 25, 2010

Tagore's art creates records in London





Continued confidence in the Indian market and the ever-growing appetite for contemporary art both in India and elsewhere were in evidence when lively bidding between art collectors and trade buyers helped boost sales of South Asian art at Sotheby's, London two weeks ago.

Twelve of Tagore's paintings, portraits and landscapes were sold for £1.6 million (Rs. 11.13 crores). First time to appear at an auction, these Tagore pieces were part of the Dartington Hall Trust, a charitable organization based in South Devon in the UK. Tagore's Untitled (Portrait of a Woman) a watercolor and colored ink on paper, signed 'Rabindra' and dated '38' in Bengali, that measures 49.5 x 40 cm. (19-1/2 x 15-3/4) created a record for the late artist and sold at seven times the high estimate for £313,250 (Rs. 21.54 crores). The previous auction record for a work by Tagore for his Death Scene was £144,500 at Sotheby's in May 2008.

Most Indians know Rabindranath Tagore as a poet, philosopher and songwriter and perhaps as the first Indian Nobel Prize winner for literature (1913). But, did you know that Tagore took to creating art when he was 70?

At the auction, yet another Indian artist Somnath Hore (1921-2006) also created a record with his The Khajani Player, 1995 that was bought by an Indian collector for £157,250 (10.81 crores). The bronze sculpture that measures 125 x 96 cm (49-1/4 x 37-3/4 ) graphically details the strains a musician has to endure. But the top seller was an acrylic on canvas, painted in 1979-81 - Rajasthan - by Syed Haider Raza (b. 1922) that sold at £517,250 (Rs. 35.57 crores). About 48 inches square Raza's vibrant splash of orange and pink reminds one of Jaipur, the pink city.

Englishman Leonard Elmhirst was a close friend of Tagore's in the United States and after graduating from Cornell University in 1921, traveled to India to become Tagore's secretary. He and his wife Dorothy purchased an estate in Dartington to promote Tagore's interest in art, education and social reconstruction, subjects very close to Leonard's heart as well.

Holly Brackenbury, Deputy Director of Indian Art at Sotheby's, said, proceeds from these sales will be part of an investment for developing art and sustainability initiatives. The trust will celebrate Tagore's 150th birth anniversary between May 1 and 7 next year.

(A New York based independent trend writer, Raj S. Rangarajan reports on the art market and auto shows and reviews films for media based in New York; Toronto, Canada; Seoul, Korea and India.)

Pictures courtesy: Sotheby's
talktoretailplus@yahoo.com

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Raavan or Raavanan: Film Review, July 2010




Toronto, Canada

Raavan or Raavanan – The Film Makes one Think

Raj S. Rangarajan

NEW YORK: When one thinks of a Bollywood film one normally associates it with escapism, with fun or fantasy or both. So, when the film Raavan (Hindi) or Raavanan (Tamil) came along, one was forced to wear one’s thinking cap and wonder what exactly was director Mani Ratnam trying to convey.
In a first-of-its-kind, live experience with the actors and maker of Raavan, thanks to Cisco technology’s TelePresence – media from New York, Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi and Dubai could see and hear clearly, in real-time, face-to-face interactions between participants: Director Mani Ratnam and Tamil actor Vikram in Chennai and Aishwarya Rai Bachchan and Abhishek Bachchan in Mumbai, thousands of miles away.

To a question Ratnam explained why he was not into sending messages to society at large. “I am not providing any message, I merely share an emotion, share a thought, share laughter, that’s what we do.” The director has stretched the 138-minute film a bit to live up to the title since the 14-year Ramayana analogy had to be adapted to 14 days for the movie. The allegory is clear. You have the forest, the intrigue, the 14 years, the name of the film, the locations and the usual connection between good and evil except that one is left wondering whether good really triumphs over evil or is it love that conquers.

Ratnam suggests, one should see Raavan or Raavanan from Ragini's (Aishwarya) point of view. (She plays the same role in both: Hindi and Tamil.) Wife of a police inspector, Ragini has clear views on right and wrong. In her journey there is the hunter and the hunted and with roles and characters constantly changing, one wonders if the hunted becomes the hunter. The battle between good and evil continues, and when the lines between them tend to blur one wonders whom to favor: the cops (Inspector Dev played by Prithviraj in Hindi and Vikram in Tamil) or a tribal chief Beera Munda (Abhishek in Hindi) or Veeraiya (Vikram in Tamil) who fancies Ragini.

Actor Govinda could have been used better in the Hindi version. He pops up suddenly (like Hanuman) specially when he has to help the inspector-husband, Dev, who sees himself as the law, the punisher and the righteous. The untamed but popular tribal leader kidnaps Ragini, (an epitome of conscience and beauty) to avenge abuse of his sister played by Priyamani (Jamuna in Hindi and Vennila in Tamil) by the inspector’s men. Aishwarya shows emotion in a few scenes and Abhishek's effort at emotional conflict is commendable.

Both, the Tamil and Hindi versions were above par though Vikram, the Tamil actor (as Dev) has performed better than Abhishek in the same role. Ratnam brushed aside Vikram’s initial hesitation about playing Dev in Hindi. Says Vikram, “The most difficult thing for me was the Hindi version, I didn’t want to do it, but “Mani-sir” said, “You can do it and boosted my confidence.” Added Vikram, “I found every location beautiful. Wherever we went, we had to drive down in a car for two hours, then get into a jeep for an hour and walk for another 15 minutes, and the beautiful sites [in North India and South India] were visual treats.” Overall, it’s a plus for Vikram in two combative roles in the same movie.

Cinematographers Santosh Sivan and V. Manikandan have done a terrific job with some of the footage literally breathtaking: the collapsing bridge, rivals hanging literally to the bridge in adverse weather and a romantic ambience showing love-birds about to sit down for wine and dinner while overlooking soothing waters.

To another journo query, Abhishek responded, “I feel the audience will question themselves after this film. I think whenever I saw the rushes or when dubbing the film or even while performing, I think Mani as a director, was asking the audience, “what is right, what is wrong and who is to decide? What is right for Beera in the film is completely wrong for Dev. Who is to decide that Dev is right and Beera is wrong? What is right and what is wrong and who are we to judge?”

Talking of their relationship as a "married couple" a question arose about their credibility and chemistry on screen specially since in Raavan, the roles are adversarial. Aishwarya responded: “We all work together as a team to commit and to deliver. We are creating cinema. At that point, its not about personal equations, or what kind of relationship you share outside the set. We are all actors, we are all committed to the craft. That’s what it is all about. Abhishek joked, “I am not chasing her in the film, I have already kidnapped her.”

On differences between Hindi and Tamil versions, Ratnam said, “the idea was to make people see both versions and compare…essentially the same film but I do not believe in imposing that this is how a scene should be done, in terms of content and spirit, its the same.” Which has indeed come through in both the versions.

Its not a straightforward story of good triumphing over evil, there are wheels within wheels, and one needs to really think as to what is happening in today’s world – the dances and the costumes (Sabyas Achi) and the music (A.R. Rahman) notwithstanding. Some of the scenes where gruesomely symbolic (cutting off a coward’s hand) or shooting a defenseless man point blank. One wondered who was the torturer: the tribal or the cop?
_____________________________

[Raj S. Rangarajan is a New York based freelance writer. He covers trend stories on art, reviews books and films for media based in New York; Toronto, Canada; Seoul, Republic of Korea; and India. He can be reached at raj.rangarajan@gmail.com]

Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Tagore Paintings Top $2 Million At South Asian Art Sale



by Raj S. Rangarajan

NEW YORK—Sotheby’s sale of South Asian art in London on June 15 realized a total of £5.5 million ($8.1 million), with 12 paintings by Rabindranath Tagore (1861–1941) selling for £1.6 million ($2.36 million)—a remarkable event considering that the artist is known more for his literature than his art. The auction was 90 percent sold by value and 78 percent sold by lot.

The top ten lots all sold at prices above estimates, with Tagore’s watercolor and colored ink drawing Untitled (Portrait of a Woman), 1938, selling for an artist-record £313,250 ($461,229), seven times the estimate of £30,000/40,000.

Holly Brackenbury, deputy director of Islamic and Indian Art at Sotheby’s, said the 12 Tagore paintings had “distinguished provenance” and had never appeared before on the open market. They were consigned by the Dartington Hall Trust to raise money for investment in the arts, social justice and sustainability, “issues that were very close to Tagore’s own heart,” Brackenbury said.

The first Asian ever to win a Nobel Prize for Literature, Tagore has long been lauded in India as a poet, novelist and musician. Born in Calcutta (now Kolkata), Tagore started painting later in life.

The top lot of the sale, however, was Rajasthan, 1979–81, an acrylic on canvas by Syed Haider Raza (b. 1922), which took £517,250 ($761,599) on a £300,000/500,000 estimate, followed by Untitled (Nude), 1955, an oil on board by Francis Newton Souza (1924–2002), which brought £373,250 ($549,573) on a £60,000/80,000 estimate. A record was set for Somnath Hore (1921–2006) when the bronze The Khajani Player, 1995, was purchased by an Indian private collector for £157,250 ($231,535), topping the estimate of £130,000/150,000. Zara Porter-Hill, director and head of South Asian art at Sotheby’s, said the “results demonstrate the continued confidence in the Indian market and the ever-growing appetite both in India and around the world for South Asian art. Bidding came from a healthy mix of private collectors and trade buyers and their interest produced lively bidding battles.”

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Upbeat Results at Christie’s Hong Kong Spring Auctions



by Raj S. Rangarajan

NEW YORK—The spring series of auctions at Christie’s in Hong Kong May 28–June 2 took in a total of HK$2.3 billion ($294 million). Sales of fine art totaled HK$994.6 million ($127.7 million), and records were set for works by Chinese, Japanese, Italian and Filipino artists. Last year’s sales of Asian art brought in a total of HK$401.2 million ($51.6 million) in comparison (ANL, 6/9/09).

The evening sale of Asian contemporary art and Chinese 20th-century art on May 29 was 100 percent sold both by lot and by value—a rare event. The 36-lot sale brought in a total of HK$303.4 million ($39 million). String Quartet, 1986, an oil on canvas by Chen Yifei (1946–2005), sold for ten times its estimate of HK$4 million/6 million, setting a new auction record for the artist. It was bought by an Asian trade buyer for HK$61.1 million ($7.9 million).

The second- and third-highest selling lots in the sale were both paintings by Sanyu: Vase of Lilies with Red Ground, 1940s (estimate: HK$12 million/18 million), and Pink Leopard, 1940s–’50s (estimate: HK$8 million/12 million), sold for above-estimate prices of HK$25.3 million ($3.25 million) and HK$21.9 million ($2.8 million), respectively. Three of the top ten lots were by Zao Wou-Ki (b. 1920). The oil 02-1-65, 1965, sold for HK$20.8 million ($2.7 million) on an HK$8 million/12 million estimate; 14-3-59, 1959, brought the same price against an estimate of HK$10 million/15 million. And 25-10-90, 1990, sold for HK$9.6 million ($1.2 million), within the estimate of HK$6.5 million/10 million.

Records were also set for Japanese artists Tomoko Konoike (b. 1960)—whose Chapter Three “Wreck,” 2005, a set of seven paintings, sold for HK$2.06 million ($266,000) on an estimate of HK$800,000/1.2 million—and Akira Yamaguchi (b. 1969), whose set of four paintings Shintenno (Jikokuten, Zochoten, Tamonten, Komokuten), 2006, was sold for HK$1.9 million ($239,096) against a HK$1.5 million/2.5 million estimate.

Eric Chang, Christie’s international director of Asian contemporary and Chinese 20th-century art, said, “With Asian buyers winning many of the lots among intensive international bidding, it is clear that collectors in the region are more sophisticated and diverse than ever before, and that the Hong Kong art market has now firmly established itself as a formidable hub in the contemporary art world.”

The day sale of Asian contemporary art yielded a total of HK$115 million ($14.76 million), with the top lot, Portrait of Andy Warhol, 2005, by Zeng Fanzhi (b. 1964), selling for HK$5.06 million ($649,704), three times the estimate of HK$1 million/1.5 million. A record was set for a work by Chinese artist Yu Youhan (b. 1943), whose Mao in an Easy Chair, 1992, sold for HK$4.2 million ($541,848), 14 times the HK$200,000/300,000 estimate. Records were also set for works by Ding Yi (b. 1962)—whose Appearance of Crosses, ca. 1990s, sold for HK$4.10 million ($526,440), six times the estimate of HK$400,000/600,000—and Guan Yong (b. 1975), whose Do You Know? We are so distressed, 2007, fetched HK$2.4 million ($310,728) on a HK$1.2 million/2.2 million estimate. Liu Wei’s Landscape, 2006, sold for HK$4.6 million ($588,700) on a HK$1.5 million/2 million estimate, and Zhang Xiaogang’s Bloodline Series, 1997, sold for HK$4.1 million ($526,000) against a HK$2.5 million/3.5 million estimate.

The day sale of Chinese 20th-century art on May 30 brought in a total of HK$105 million ($13.5 million), and was 80 percent sold by lot and 91 percent sold by value. Zao again dominated the high end of the sale, with six out of the top ten lots. All brought higher-than-expected prices, the highest being for La course de Chevaux (Horse Racing), 1952, which sold for HK$5.4 million ($695,928) on a HK$1.5 million/2 million estimate, followed by 3-1-61, 1961, which took HK$4.8 million ($618,888) on a HK$2.4 million/3.2 million estimate.

The sale of Chinese modern paintings on May 28 totaled HK$215.1 million ($27.6 million). Lady Holding Lotus, 1954, a scroll painting by Zhang Daqian (1899–1983), sold to a Chinese collector for HK$14.1 million ($1.81 million), more than four times the estimate of HK$2 million/3 million. Cormorants, 1935, a scroll painting by Xu Bei Hong (1895–1953), sold for HK$13.5 million ($1.74 million) against an identical estimate. Ben Kong, Christie’s international specialist head of Chinese paintings, said the “sales showed continuing strength with active bidding, with many lots going well over the high estimates.”

The sale of Southeast Asian modern and contemporary art on May 30 brought in a total of HK$44.5 million ($5.7 million). The top lot was Young Balinese Girl with Hibiscus, 1939, by Italian painter Romualdo Locatelli (1905–43), which set an artist record, selling to an Asian collector for HK$6 million ($773,000) against an estimate of HK$2.2 million/3.2 million. The oil on canvas was one of the first portraits the artist painted in Bali. Lavenderas, 1923, by Filipino painter Fernando Cueto Amorsolo (1892–1972), also set a record, selling for HK$3.4 million ($437,000) against an estimate of HK$300,000/500,000.

The sale of Chinese classical paintings and calligraphy on May 28 totaled HK$115.9 million ($14.9 million), led by Birds and Flowers, 1748, by Hua Yan (1682–1756) which sold for HK$19.1 million ($2.45 million), three times estimate. The Young Hercules, 1732, by Leng Mei (17th–18th century) sold for HK$16.9 million ($2.17 million), 11 times the high estimate.

The Songde Tang Collection of Chinese modern paintings took in HK$95.7 million ($12.3 million), and was 95 percent sold by lot, 99 percent by value. The top lot, Amaranth, Crickets, Persimmon and Peaches, a scroll by Qi Baishi (1863–1957), sold for HK$10.6 million ($1.36 million) on an estimate of HK$800,000/1 million.

Friday, June 11, 2010

Interviews of Mani Ratnam, Aishwarya, Abhishek, Vikram: Raavan, June 11, 2010







Ultimate Bollywood » Bollywood Features » 2010
Abhishek is wonderful to work with as an actor - Aishwarya


by Raj S. Rangarajan

In a first-of-its-kind, live experience with the actors and maker of the movie Raavan - being released all over the world, June 18, journalists from New York, Chennai, Mumbai, Delhi and Dubai were treated to rare, candid footage. The occasion was a promo for the 138-minute movie being released simultaneously in Hindi and Tamil. Thanks to Cisco technology's TelePresence - we could see and hear clearly, in real-time, face-to-face interactions between participants: Director Mani Ratnam and actor Vikram in Chennai and Aishwarya Rai Bachchan and Abhishek Bachchan in Mumbai, thousands of miles away.

Marked by interesting discussions, the interviews were laced with free-flowing friendly banter, and camaraderie much of it unstructured but interesting and informative. For instance, did you know that Mani Ratnam was not into sending subtle messages to the public at large through his films, but primarily to entertain; or that as a couple Abhishek and Aishwarya are constantly complementing each other which is perhaps a great quality, or that Aishwarya tends to break into peels of laughter when completing a sentence thus preventing us from hearing the end of the sentence; or that for Aishwarya, it was a toss-up between pursuing her studies in architecture or joining the film industry. "If not for Mani Ratnam I would have been in architecture."

Did you know that "Mani-sir" as Mani Ratnam is affectionately known in the industry had to advise "AB" as he calls Abhishek, to loosen up and not be constantly "propah" all the time. Says Mani, "actually when I made the first film with Abhishek, I was very, very worried that he was a proper, straightforward guy, so I asked him to learn to use bad words; I didn't know (however) there was a "monster" inside!"

Mani Ratnam suggests, one should see Raavan from Ragini's (Aishwarya) point of view. An ordinary woman who has clear views on right and wrong. In her journey there is the hunter and the hunted and with roles constantly changing, characters keep changing, and the hunted becomes the hunter. The battle between good and evil continues, and when the lines between them tend to blur one wonders whom to favor: whether the cops or the residents of a jungle in North India, whether a police inspector, Dev or a tribal chief, Beera who fancies Ragini. And, love is the battle that nobody seems to win, but everyone fights for. Cinematographers Santosh Sivan and V. Manikandan and A.R. Rahman's music are exemplary, not to ignore the editing and dance scenes.

Literal Cliffhangers

To a question to the two men about the tough cliff-hanging scenes, Vikram said, "the worst was the Hindi dubbing, not the fights." But, Abhishek said, "I wasn't apprehensive at all. I was the complete opposite, I was looking forward to this stuff, because, if we are doing this active stuff like sliding down a cliff, we were not "doing the scene" though I regretted it for four days after that since I couldn't sit properly, but anything to get out of the scene was good enough for us. I was happy with no dialogues."

Journalist: You have been working with Abhishek for quite some time now. How do you actually see yourself as a couple on screen? How do you critique your performances with him?
Aishwarya: Wow, that's intense. I don't know, its suddenly making me want to say that we do.
Abhishek: We don't need to critique ourselves. We have other people to do it for us. (laughter). As a wife she has always been very supportive and has been equally supporting as a co-star; I have always said, she's one of the few co-stars who is very interactive; she's known to stand behind the camera and give off-camera dialogues."

Talking of their relationship as a "married couple" a question arose about their credibility and chemistry on screen specially since in Raavan, the roles are adversarial.
Aishwarya responded: We all work together as a team to commit and to deliver. We are creating cinema. At that point, its not about personal equations, or what kind of a relationship you share outside off the set. We are all actors, we are all here to commit to a craft. That's what it is all about. Abhishek joked, "I am not chasing her in the film, I have already kidnapped her."

In a related question, according to Abhishek, Ragini, in Raavan is Aishwarwa's best performance to date. Before that I felt, her performance in Guru was exceptional, and never got the due it deserved. In Guru, Mithun-da and she were by far the best in the film. My character was also tough but I got the easier part. But in Raavan, she has blown the Guru performance out of the water, pun fully intended. "I think, its amazing, despite physically going through whatever she does as a character in the film, hold on to your the dignity and still maintain her character as a strong person, its easy to become a whiner in such a situation."

Aishwarya returned the compliment soon with "Abhishek is wonderful to work with as an actor. I have always believed he is a very free actor, he is somebody who is ready to go out there, dive right in and accept roles and characters in a variety of genre, without limiting himself...what I like is, he works as a team member, working like all of us, under the guidance and fulfilling the director's vision, and that's what gives us absolute joy working together." Coming back to your basic question, "We don't rate each other...we enjoy working with each other as co-actors."

Rough Going As a Tribal

To a question as to what he discovered about himself, Abhishek in a lighter note said, "What I learnt was very scientific actually. I learnt that reverse osmosis can happen with the human skin. And we do prune up after 15 minutes in the water. There is no such thing as water retention, and that snakes can swim apart from sea-snakes, and rats may attack human beings, also that leeches are in the habit of getting into rather uncomfortable areas!"

But, on a serious note, Abhishek added: "I am not trying to be over-sentimental. When you have love and respect for someone like Mani, I would be willing to do whatever he said, and I stick to that. I know the three actors sitting in this room, and because of our love and respect for Mani - no matter what he told us to do - we would do it with a smile on our face, for love of the craft. Mani is never going to allow us to do anything that he is not 100% sure of in terms of our safety. We conveniently stood on dry land and I have photos of Mani standing in the waterfall while the entire unit was running for shelter. And, he would stand there the whole day."

Continuing the compliment, Abhishek says, "Mani leads by example. Nothing is impossible, nothing is a difficult task, Mani would be at the location way ahead of you. One would notice his very protective expression every time, we were doing these impossible tasks. Mani will be there, totally concerned, extremely protective, and that's what we were constantly reassured of, when we work with someone like him. There is the love, there is the caring, well-looked after personally and as actors. We feel honored to work with him, we do films because we believe in it, I believe in Mani Ratnam, I love his cinema, I love the work he gives me and have a great time working with him, I like to believe that in me, he sees an actor who can fulfill his vision. He's a story-teller, I am an actor, and we work for the audience and they are the most important. We are here for the audience, we are not here to satisfy our egos."

Iruvar to Raavan

When asked about her journey from her first Tamil film, Iruvar to Raavan, Aishwarya let it flow: "My journey has been a wonderful journey, and have been very grateful for the kind of work I have had and hopefully, learning something from Mani my first guru, my first teacher will really be the one to throw more light. After Iruvar, getting to working with a film titled Guru couldn't have been more apt."

Asked to rate Mani Ratnam's role in her career, Aishwarya said, "Even before I got to work with him, I was more than thankful, it was a godsend that he even called on me, I couldn't believe it because I was a fan. Across borders people absolutely love his cinema, It will not be fair to rate him at all in any kind of role. His cinema itself speaks volumes, as an audience to enjoy his creativity, and as actors, to have gotten the opportunity as creative people we thoroughly enjoy it and cherish it."

To a question whether the two actors, Abhishek and Vikram who played the same role compared notes, Abhishek responded, "I have always been the kind of actor who likes the villain. I am a team player, I like a collaborative effort, and "Kenny-sar" (Vikram's other name) is someone I have huge amount of respect for. I have seen all his films and he's somebody I look up to him to as an actor. I would be foolish if I didn't consult him and seek his guidance on the set.

Q to actors: What do you think the audience will take away from this movie?
Vikram: I agree. All of us have put in a lot of hard work, and it's a very inspired film. Even while working in the film I forgot that I was an actor, I just felt, I was part of the film, I wanted to watch every aspect of the movie, its making, I felt like I was like in a workshop, knowing so much more about cinema, something told me, I am not even thinking of the commercial viability of the film. I just saw it as a lovely experience, and I know that everyone watching the film is gonna take away that feeling, they are going to go home, thinking and wondering what this film is all about, the sounds, the visuals, the shots, it could be just the drama between the three of us, or the performances.
Aishwarya: It has been a work of passion by the entire team, we obviously make our films for the audience, not for private viewing, so you hope that you enjoy and cherish the experience of the entire film as much as we all did making it.
Abhishek: I also feel the audience will question themselves after this film. I think whenever I saw the rushes or when dubbing the film or even while performing, I think Mani, as a director, is asking the audience the question, and the question is, "what is right, what is wrong and who is to decide? What is right for Beera in the film is completely wrong for Dev. Who is to decide that Dev is right and Beera is wrong? Or, the other way around? What is right and what is wrong and who are we to judge? And, should we be judging? View a situation from a particular point of view before judging and then view it from another person's point of view before passing judgment on that. That's what I took away after performing in this film."

When Mani Ratnam Calls You Answer

Q for all 3 actors:
When Mani Ratnam calls, you never refuse. So, what does he do as a director to each of you? What happens on the set? You have all worked with so many other directors, but some of your best performances are with Mani. What does he find within you?
Aishwarya: Working with Mani firstly whets your appetite, your hunger as an actor, as a creative person, he feeds that hunger and then only builds your appetite. Each time you work with him, one feels, so much work, so much to learn, so much more to do and feeds that urge for creative satisfaction, he really encourages, it is demanding whether physically, creatively, whatever it is, but at the end of the day, one feels that you have done some good work. You come away giving a part of yourself to creativity and of course learning from him as an experience. But then it spoils you, and he only wants more. That's how it working with Mani Ratnam each time.
Abhishek: My answer is a lot simpler. The first time I worked with Mani, and the first time it was released, I saw Yuva, I said, really, I can do that? Did I really do that? Mani has always given me this huge boost in confidence as a creative person or as an artist, and I am convinced that Mani knows me better than I do myself. He knows my boundaries and my potential much better than myself. To be very honest, be it Lalit Singh of Yuva or Gurukant Desai of Guru, or Beera of Raavan, had anybody else offered me that role, I would have said, "No, way, I can't do that, nor would I have dared to perform that role."

Vikram: Since college I have always felt, if only I do a movie with Mr. Mani Ratnam, I can actually retire after that, but I take that back now. My priorities are very different I want to be with this master craftsman, this fantastic director, I want to do a film with him, take Nayakan or Agni Nakshatram or Mouna Raagam, and as I was growing up as an artiste and got into movies, I realized he had already sent up a benchmark, specially in Tamil cinema or even in Indian cinema. When working with him I realized, he is just not thinking of all that, he is always being innovative, he is always thinking on his feet, he kinda pushes the envelope every time, and when I watched the film being made, this man is a genius who doesn't know that. We have to constantly remind him of that. He doesn't want to hear that even now. Here's a man who is actually treating Raavan as his first film... like do-or-die, this film is going to make my career, is what he thinks. When I work with him I realize that it's just direction, it could be sound, an audio release, something that he does has to be different, think about him, everyone is looking up to him, and every time he has to do something different, and he does it, and even with Raavan, he has really done it this time. I think it was such a pleasure and honor working with him.
Aishwarya: Actually Mani Ratnam helped me make a decision to join films. I used to be very confused, I was getting offers, the day I knew there was a possibility of working with Mani Ratnam, the genius director that he is, kinda decided it for me. I didn't even think of pursuing my education in architecture. He's the reason why I am in movies today.

DVDs and Commentaries

Q to Mani Ratnam:
With so few scripts that come out published as books today, I mean, there's Kandukondain, Three Idiots recently, so few DVDs with directors' commentaries, e.g., Taare Zameen Par, Om Shanti Om, I am just wondering why do you think that both of these are lacking so much in Hindi, Tamil, basically most Indian cinema. Will you do a commentary track on the DVD for Raavan?
Mani Ratnam: I think, most of the time when you finish a film, you are so relieved to get out of the film, that you don?t want to get back there and work on the commentary on it again, one needs a little gap, a little distance before you do it. But, I think, it will start happening, things are changing and if scripts are getting published, commentaries are adding value, more and more people are seeing films on DVD, and its good to be able to share something more than just the drama that we see on screen. Eventually, all of us will have to do that to make the film wholesome.

Q: Any specific differences between the Tamil and Hindi versions?
Mani Ratnam:The idea was to make people see both versions, compare similarities and differences... there will be differences...and that too two different actors and with two different approaches. Essentially the same film but I do not believe in imposing that this is how a scene should be done...but if he they put themselves into the character, and get that out, which both of them actually have done, so, there will be that difference in language, also in the Tamil version, and some words will be different which is right for each of the languages, but essentially in terms of content, in terms of the spirit, it is the same.

Q: You have done several films with complex roles. How does this role compare to some of the other movies?
Abhishek: All previous roles put into one, and amplified by 100: that is Beera of Raavan, he is completely wild, crazy, unpredictable, I have run out of words to describe the man, definitely the most challenging film and character that I have ever done. And the wonderful thing is, I said the same thing when I did Guru, said the same thing when I did Yuva. I love that about Mani; he is always giving me career-defining work, he's always giving me work that I am still remembered by, and I really feel, Beera is bigger and hopefully, will be better than the previous two.

Aparajit to Raavan

Q to Vikram: From Aparajit to Raavan, what difference have you seen in Hindi films over the years? Do you think it?s a good experience, a pleasant one? Would we see you in more Hindi films after Raavan?
Vikram: Actually, Aparajit was a dubbed version of a Tamil film called Anniyan. There, I had to be very dramatic but underplayed but in Raavan I could show my dramatic talent. I didn't really direct contact with the Hindi film world then. Because of the variety of roles that are available now one has to look up to Hindi films, and we have started loving films such as Paa, and Cheeni Kum, which are so very different. I often wonder why we can't make a Laagan in South India? We have had people like Mani-sar who have always done great films. As regard the future I'll wait for another day, if another Raavan or a Aparajit happens, and if Mani-sar calls me I am always there.

Q to Abhishek and Vikram: What is one favorite quality of the character you play in Raavan?
Vikram: I would say, he is very volatile, which in the sense is not one quality, I love that. Most of the scenes, Mani-sar would say...Sometimes we'll be in a serious tone, sometimes very melodramatic, then Mani would say, why don't you try all the serious tones, since we may have to be high on emotion, or flat. Beera had to be a flat or a minor, but I liked that thing about him. Something I had never been able to do with any other characters I have done.
Abhishek: I would agree with Kenny-sar (read Vikram). The greatest quality about Beera was that he was directed by Mani Ratnam.

Q: What was the most challenging experience? What was the most beautiful experience?
Aishwarya: This movie will be the most beautiful experience which we all will treasure for ever. The most difficult part was we were challenged creatively, and submitting to what he is looking for creatively. The entire team, the crew, the setting guys, the lights guys, everybody is the true hero of this film.
Vikram: The most difficult thing for me was the Hindi version, I didn't want to do it, but Mani said, "You can do it." And gave me some confidence. I found every location beautiful. Wherever we went, we had to drive down into a car for two hours, then get into a jeep for an hour and walk for another 15 minutes, I have seen some of the most beautiful sites such as Malshei Ghats or Orchha or Arjunkali, and the movie itself was such a visual treat.

To a question if Mani Ratnam was tacking current issues and providing a message and providing entertainment, the director emphasized, "I am not providing a message, I merely share an emotion, share a thought, share laughter, that's what we do."

In relation to working with A.R. Rahman for the music composition of Raavan, Ratnam said, "it was just like working with him for Roja, no different, I think he was as brilliant then as he is now, and is as easy and as difficult to work with then and as he is now. He is more and more into it, and the more he wants to do, the more he is willing to experiment, try something lateral, something unconventional. His understanding of cinema is very good and every time he is able to do something different to push the envelope."

[Raj S. Rangarajan is a New York based independent writer. He covers trend stories on art, reviews books and films for media based in New York; Toronto, Canada; Seoul, Republic of Korea; and India. He can be reached at raj.rangarajan@gmail.com]